I found this article on 8 April 2022 on Newspapers.com. This article reads as:
HANFORD
DAILY JOURNAL
VOL.III. HANFORD, KINGS COUNTY, CAL., FRIDAY EVENING, JULY 28, 1899, NO. 74
A WILL CONTEST.
The Will of Samuel Page, Deceased, Attacked.
Solomon C. Page, a son, and Mary A. Garver, a daughter of Samuel C. Page, deceased, today filed in the Superior Court of Kings county a contest against the will filed in the Superior Court, purporting to be the last will and testament of the deceased. The grounds of contest are numerous, and they cover seven pages of closely type-written copy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The first ground of contest is that said Samuel Page was not, at the date when said instrument was written, of sound and disposing mind; that he was at that date and had been for a time prior thereto, suffering with paresis, or what is commonly called softening of the brain; the said Samuel Page was when he signed said alleged will acting under undue influence exerted by Lillian H. Page, his wife, whom deceased had recently married, and whose marriage with the deceased was the consumation of a plot or design to complicate certain ligitation pending at the date of said marriage, between said Samuel Page and these contestants.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
It recites how Mrs. Page first met the deceased and signed a marriage contract with him, and that at that date the said Samuel Page was practically insolvent, and that he had no property with which to carry out the purported will now proposed for probate, and that the terms of the purported will now proposed for probate are inconsistant with the said contract; that said purported will is ambiguous and is not susceptible of interpretation in connection with other instruments and suits and controversies referred to therein. For the purpose of further showing that the said Samuel Page's signature was fraudulently obtained to the said purported will, contestants allege that they are informed and believe, and on such information allege that in the month of April, 1898, M.L. Short drew and prepared for said Samuel Page an instrument
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
as the last will and testament of the said Samuel Page, and which will, together with a certain codicil, executed in 1898, is, as contestants are informed, now on file in the
Superior Court of Kings county, California; that thereafter, on the sixth day of April, 1899, the said Samuel Page for the purpose of carrying out his independent and sole purpose, at the Bank of Hanford, wrote out and signed an article as his last will and testament, and deposited the same with J.O. Hickman. That the purported will now prepared for probate is dated just twelve days later than the one dated April 6th; that the one of April 6, 1899, is consistent with the one of April 18, 1898, but that the purported will for probate is incompatible with and antagonistic to the Said Samuel Page's purposes expressed just twelve days previously, and that during all the time intervening between the 6th day of April and the 18th day of April, said Samuel Page was suffering
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ with softening of the brain, technically termed "Paresis," and with which disease said deceased died just sixty-seven days after the said purported will was written and signed.
That the contestants are informed and believe that at the time of writing said last will, Rowen, Irwin and Ed Shuey, the attorneys in the employ of the deceased became interest in the advancement of the said conspiracy and counseled and advised the said Samuel Page that it was his duty to provide for the said Lillian H. Page by making a will in her favor, and that it was his duty to cut off these contestants. And the said Lilian H. Pate, for the purpose of encouraging and in-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~fluencing him to sign the said purported will, falsely pretended to the said Samuel Page that she was a strong believer of the peculiar religious theories adhered to by the said Samuel Page. Contestants are informed and believe that the testament is not a last will and testament at all, and that the same was not entirely written, dated and signed by the said Samuel Page, but that the entire instrument was written by some other person than the deceased, with the single exception of the signature thereto, which appears to be in the hand writing of decreased.
T.E. Clark and Hudson & Pryer are the attorneys for contestants and Rowen Irwin, Roth & McFadzean and Ed Shuey are attorneys for proponent.
©All rights reserved by Pathways in Genealogy. 2018 - 2023. No part of this website/blog may be reproduced without the express written permission from the owner.